Eco Digital Blog

Submitted by ECO Editor on Friday, September 7, 2018 - 20:12

In the corridors of the UN conference centre in Bangkok, ECO heard a widespread old mantra: “Finance is POLITICAL”. Well, yes, finance is political, as most of the issues you’re negotiating here are. Should it prevent Parties from progressing on the elements in the agenda, therefore putting at risk an ambitious overall outcome by Sunday? Clearly not. Is it an excuse for the EU to spend their time in rainy Bangkok hiding behind a toxic Umbrella? Hell no. Countries cannot leave Thailand without a clear pathway on finance from here to Katowice.

Related Newsletter :
Submitted by ECO Editor on Friday, September 7, 2018 - 20:10

ECO wants to draw the attention of negotiators to the tens of thousands of people here in Bangkok and around the world taking part in more than 600 Rise for Climate actions this weekend. In more than 80 countries, communities are taking part in a range of creative, distributed local actions in cities, towns, institutions, universities, and places of worship to demonstrate the urgency of the climate crisis.

Related Newsletter :
Submitted by ECO Editor on Friday, September 7, 2018 - 20:08

ECO is pulling out the popcorn for the discussion on the transition away from Kyoto Protocol mechanisms today. The current Annex on the table is vague about where we are going and when, but it’s clearly on the minds of a large number of Parties, so we think it’ll spark some serious discussion.

Related Newsletter :
Submitted by ECO Editor on Thursday, September 6, 2018 - 20:18

As hundreds of wet negotiators who walked back from the conference centre this week can attest to, we all prefer some sun and blue skies. But we are still far away from blue skies for the Paris Agreement Work Program (PAWP). True, some hard work from negotiators made a few clouds go away but there is still much work to be done. A few ominous grey storm clouds have appeared on the horizon (did anyone say NDC registry?).

With only three days left, ECO is happy to provide you with some thoughts on how to get nearer to blue skies for COP:

Related Newsletter :
Submitted by ECO Editor on Thursday, September 6, 2018 - 20:16

Question: what happens when there is no longer a long- term? No, this is not a bleak pondering on where current emissions trajectories will lead us, although that is probably warranted.

Rather, we’re thinking about the long-term finance (LTF) work programme, which includes annual in-session workshops, biennial high-level ministerial dialogues on climate finance (mark your calendars: the next one is at COP 24!), and an annual COP decision where Parties have the opportunity to assess progress in climate financing, including issues of scaling up, balance, effectiveness and access.

Related Newsletter :
Submitted by ECO Editor on Thursday, September 6, 2018 - 20:14

Technology transfer is vital if we are serious about limiting warming to 1.5°C. The technology framework was included in the Paris Agreement to provide guidance on technology as part of the means of implementation. The framework was meant to enhance the process of delivering technology to support transformational climate action.

Related Newsletter :
Submitted by ECO Editor on Thursday, September 6, 2018 - 20:12

Rules, Rules, Rules – they are important and we all knowweneedthem!Themeetingroomsherearefilledwith delegates engaged in intense discussions over the minutiae of the Paris rulebook. The incoming Polish Presidency also never misses a chance to emphasize their laser focus on the rulebook outcome as their absolute priority for COP 24.

Related Newsletter :
Submitted by ECO Editor on Thursday, September 6, 2018 - 20:10

Australia’s new Prime Minister, Scott Morrison has just toured the 100 per cent drought stricken country-side of the most populous state, refusing to recognise any possible connection to climate impacts – all while unprecedented bushfires rage during winter!

Related Newsletter :
Submitted by ECO Editor on Thursday, September 6, 2018 - 20:08

There’s a new brand of sceptic in our midst: the loss and damage sceptic. Just like the kind you’re more familiar with, they also deny the evidence of climate impacts right in front of their eyes. It almost defies imagination that parties would be arguing against the inclusion of loss and damage in the Global Stocktake (and elsewhere) given the litany of climate impacts that have been wreaking havoc all over the world.

Related Newsletter :
Submitted by ECO Editor on Thursday, September 6, 2018 - 20:06

We at ECO are wondering whether we should have a chat with the nice lawyers at the UNFCCC Secretariat.

We’ve spotted a problem with the agenda that is increasingly creating confusion. We think the ‘SBI informal consultation on common timeframes’ (CTFs) might be better renamed as the‘SBI informal consultation on multiple and differentiated timeframes’, as communicated by China on behalf of LMDCs, so Parties can really relax and kick back with the scope of the exercise at hand.

Related Newsletter :

Pages